吐槽:SH家的手机~~~~~(夏普的FANS可以54此贴 )

A

azzuri

游客
[i=s] 本帖最后由 azzuri 于 2011-8-25 05:21 编辑 [/i]

In many aspects, Sharp is falling badly (I'm new to Japanese phones though, SH-12C, all my previous phones are samsung :D ), but the monitor is a big WIN.
I have played with HTC EVO 3D and LG Optimus 3D, and I can tell you without a doubt, Sharp's 3D is the best out of the three. But of course, the level of fatigue is far higher too, limitations of 3D technology at this stage. I've heard they have something new (Toshiba? Sharp?) for 3D, hopefully they will be better.
Now screen resolution. Anyone who is satisfied of 480x800 at a 4.3 inch phone is crazy. The level of details of 480x800 is simply NOT enough! When we talk about phones like Desire S, Moto defy...etc, we notice their monitor is not detailed enough because of the poor ppi. Now you literally stretch it to 3D... I mean wtf? Can you accept that low detail? iPhone 4 has a vastly detailed monitor because they are using 640x960 at a 3.5 inch. Even now Sensation and SH-12C can only operate the same at 4.2 inch... and people are satisfied with 480x800 at LO3D, SGS2? Do have to admit though, the viewing Angle of HTC Senation/Evo 3D is better than Sharp.

Music-wise, I play my music using my Ortofon eQ-7 earphone on several phones (some rented from my friends :p ), and the only brand that has better music capability is Sony. Sony and Sharp plays music with much much much more details than any other brands (with iPhone 4 among the worst... are we surprised?). Of course, one will argue now for those who are really audiophile will use Cowon mp3 player etc, but considering phone music alone, sharp and sony are up there. Samsung/HTC are plain bad.

Camera-wise, it's Sony being the best again... all other brands apart from Sony just couldn't convince me, including sharp. One thing to note though, taking 3D pictures on SH-12C is much better than Evo3D and LO3D, since I think (I think) Sharp will "modify" the photo a bit when creating 3D photo, the noise are vastly reduced, while colours are more vivid. Doing the same on e.g. Evo, the noise on the 3D pic is still extremely obvious and disturbing.

And something else.... I like Sharp's Tap Flow UI a lot, elegant, and with hell loads of flexibility. Problem is, their camera and photo-frame are so poorly written that they are so slow and unresponsive at times....

So still, Sharp is on their downfall, but they have their unique advantage. Japanese are known for their creativity... I believe they will make things right and return to the game next time round.

Sorry for the english, I can't type chinese on my computer XD Who would read them all anyway... consider that my babbling XD
 

531346663

普通会员
2011-02-24
543
0
0
[i=s] 本帖最后由 531346663 于 2011-8-25 08:38 编辑 [/i]

楼上在说鸟语....
太长了。看不下去鸟!!
F家万岁!!
出F-01B的行货。我绝对买。。
骚蓝等着我!!!
 
4

472708235

游客
其实我倒觉得吧,夏普确实是有在炒冷饭,不过是不是也可以理解成风格化?每个厂都有自己的style吧,p家和f家也有点这个意思。屏幕进步太慢是真的,不过从最初期的asv到最近的几部机器asv也在进化,但是再不出现革新确实就对不起SHARP在液晶制造上的地位了,但我不希望走三星那种艳丽到恶心的样子。拍照我认为个人因素大过机器,当然指的同等级比较
 

awefawef2

普通会员
2008-06-26
210
0
0
用过松下的机器 在做工上确实比SHARP稍差点, 屏幕黑白响应时间也不如SHARP的

CCD只有在晚上才有效果 CMOS到了夜里就是瞎子了

SHARP的听筒一直很诟病 总感觉有破音
 

awefawef2

普通会员
2008-06-26
210
0
0
还有屏幕 我仔细对比了SHARP 的ASV ( SH01B 和 SH12C ) 和三星的 AMOLED

对比之后发现 AMOLED 黑白无敌, 黑色完全无光

色彩 AMOLED 很靓丽, ASV很平淡, AMOLED有点像三星的TN屏那种很艳的感觉,ASV像IPS那种平淡的感觉 这个看个人喜好了

还有 SH12C 的色彩过渡有问题 完全不如SH01B.,
 

enhi

手机玩家
2008-11-29
335
0
16
宁可让SHARP座日本第一的交椅,不能让任何一个外国品牌占据日本市场。
 

追随1

普通会员
2010-02-05
86
0
0
夏普没有把四色液晶技术用在手机上,要是用四色液晶技术肯定比三星的要好
 

萌你妹

普通会员
2010-09-13
862
0
0
追随1 发表于 2011-8-26 09:25
夏普没有把四色液晶技术用在手机上,要是用四色液晶技术肯定比三星的要好
那要CPA的面板! 你让手机屏幕软屏? 摸下去是有波纹的!{:95_376:}
 

追随1

普通会员
2010-02-05
86
0
0
萌你妹 发表于 2011-8-26 09:34
那要CPA的面板! 你让手机屏幕软屏? 摸下去是有波纹的!
夏普是有实力研发新型的手机液晶屏幕,很期待
 

beckham8970

普通会员
2010-06-03
104
0
0
拜托,日机怎么样轮不到我们来说,就和日本人很少有玩网游的,真的很少,因为他们主机太发达了,我估摸着智能机在日本市场不是很受欢迎,以上